Talk:Chain of command

Military history: National Redirect‑class

This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Redirect

This redirect does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	National militaries task force

Politics

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics

Idea for this article

I think this article should be set up differently. It should focus less on the military use of the term "Chain of Command" and more about the general use of the term. The term is also used very widely in business, and I feel that this article is biased towards the miltary use. Is anyone else with me? --Wornwinter111 (talk) 21:55, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The use of "chain of command" is only euphemistic in business, since the actual use is management hierarchy or better still corporate structure. The aspect of command is inherent to the military so I would largely disagree that the article is biased towards the military--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 01:34, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]