Talk:Cranes (band)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
ethereal labyrinths
[edit]What the fuck does that mean? That should be destupified.
Gothic rock or shoegazers?
[edit]I've brought this up as our anonymous contributor from centurytel.net keeps changing the band's categorisation from "goth rock" to "shoegazers". Although this is arguably a rather subjective area, I don't think I've seen them referred to as anything other than a gothic rock band. I'm not particularly keen to get into a revert war (apart from it being against WP policy and all) but I also don't think that the article is correct in its current form. However, since this is supposed to be an encyclopaedia rather than my or anyone else's personal opinion I thought I'd ask for more input, eg citations etc. Anybody? Chris 18:58, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- I had a look around myself but was unable to find any clear consensus one way or the other, so I've included both categories in the description, although I'm not entirely happy with my wording. Chris 12:03, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- they're actually a dreampop band. but i'm not a wikifag, so i don't care. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.29.220.103 (talk • contribs) 02:30, 29 July 2006
- Dreampop? So you haven't heard their first couple of albums then? NickW 16:32, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
- I've heard all of their albums. If you're talking about "Self-Non-Self", that was almost 14 years ago. I think it's safe to say that the band has evolved a hell of a lot since then. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.29.220.103 (talk • contribs) 00:46, 31 July 2006
- It's an encyclopaedic article about the band's entire history, not just what they sound like now. I assume that you're the same centurytel.net user who kept changing their description from goth rock to shoegaze, so why are you now saying that it should actually be dreampop? The entry for dreampop includes shoegazing anyway, although personally I think that both titles sound rather twee and wouldn't choose either as a description. Chris 08:09, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- I agree. The article encompasses the band's entire history. Consequently shoehorning Cranes into a single category is absurd. As for which albums don't sound like 'Dreampop' then I'd suggest Fuse, Self-Non-Self, Wings Of Joy, and Forever at the very least. NickW 09:43, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
german article
[edit]i wrote the german article on cranes some months ago, but i'm not a native english speaker. but perhaps someone understands german well enough to grab some information there and make this a useful article? -- CabaretSauvignon 18:59, 2. Jun 2005 (CEST)
Band name
[edit]Why does it say "The Cranes" in the info. box? Shouldn't it just be "Cranes?" — Lee J Haywood 20:34, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, although in practice it seems to vary a bit. The former main Cranes fansite referred to them consistently as "the Cranes", though without a capitalized "The". --Delirium (talk) 07:04, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cranes (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140305153850/http://www.pennyblackmusic.co.uk/MagSitePages/Article.aspx?id=3447 to http://www.pennyblackmusic.co.uk/MagSitePages/Article.aspx?id=3447
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:00, 2 December 2016 (UTC)