Talk:Random-access memory

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Random-access memory article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as High-importance).

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 120 days may be automatically archived by Expression error: Unrecognized word "gb"..

History of term "RAM"

This article does not answer a couple rather basic questions:

When and where and by whom was the term "random access memory" in RAM coined?
Why did it stick, even though, as Prof Tanenbaum writes in his book Structured Computer Organization: The memories we have studied so far can all be read and written. Such memories are called RAMs (Random Access Memories), which is a misnomer because all memory chips are randomly accessible, but the term is too well established to get rid of now.

CapnZapp (talk) 16:55, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another meaning?

I've found a usage where it seems to mean something not matching what I've read in this article. It seems like the following are examples of random access memory as used there:

A queue
A tape
At least two registers that can store arbitrary natural numbers that you can increment and try to decrement, receiving feedback on whether that was successful.

This includes two stacks (which can be used as a tape or as registers), but not one stack. Orisphera2 (talk) 17:33, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pricing, nonsense and outdated info

CPU speed improvements slowed significantly partly due to major physical barriers and partly because current CPU designs have already hit the memory wall in some sense. -- nonsense, until today keeps being fixed with cache and other improvements. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1C01:780:4F00:C575:8111:2E10:94BA (talk) 03:21, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As a common example, the BIOS in typical personal computers often has an option called "use shadow BIOS" or similar. -- outdated, paragraph needs better words.

~400 Mbit/s via SATA3 in 2012 -- nonsense. 500 MB/s would be more like it.

1 terabyte of SSD storage can be had for $200 -- outdated, as of when? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1C01:780:4F00:C575:8111:2E10:94BA (talk) 03:19, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]